Thursday, January 3, 2013

Zombie Column: The Hobbit


These past Holidays, I've managed to watch a number of movies that I had missed out on. Luckily, on the last day I had off, I squeezed in The Hobbit with my nephew. He'd already seen it, but we had made plans a while ago (which I had kept putting off, first because I was sick, then because I was busy). We finally managed it yesterday (Yes, today I was at work. It's no fun, but a paycheck beats no paycheck with a stick).

I was pleasantly surprised where the movie started. Not the previews (Man of Steel, Oz: the Great and Powerful, Jack the Giant Slayer), but the actual movie itself. It brought back Elijah Wood and Ian Holm to reprise Frodo and Bilbo Baggins, the day of Bilbo's 111th birthday party. In fact, after a brief flashback to the dwarves losing their city, it takes us right up to when Frodo leaves to go read a book and meet Gandalf. It also reuses some terrific musical cues from the original film (Concerning Hobbits).

Anyway, then the movie goes back 60 years ago, to when Ian Holm looked like Martin Freeman, and had no adventures, which is just how normal Hobbits like it. Young Bilbo meets Gandalf (who still looks like Sir Ian McKellen), and then he meets a bunch of dwarves, and after a rather long introductory sequence, they go off on an adventure together, normal Hobbit behavior be damned. Bilbo is part Took after all, and Tooks are somewhat odd Hobbits who don't really conform to normal Hobbit-ish conventions. Good for them! Being shackled by society's conventions is no fun, no matter how fictional that society may be. Stand up for yourselves! Go on adventures! Be back home for supper! Oh, um, maybe that's not how adventures work in Middle Earth.

Adventures seems to be mostly the same, though, because I thought I saw this movie before, and it was called Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring. A group of people traipse around a place that looks an awful lot like New Zealand, and fight off increasingly ugly creatures. They even go underground, where they have to fight off and escape from a horde of enemies, including one giant one.

On the other hand, just because I've seen the movie before, doesn't mean it's not a good movie. And this movie is good. It might not be quite up to par with the other LOTR movies, but I think that's just because it took too long to get going. Mind you, Return of the King took about 20 minutes before any action happened. This one goes quite a bit longer with only a chaotic scene of Smaug the Dragon devastating a town before capturing all of the wealth in a nearby mountain as an action scene amidst a series of talky shots.

So, all in all, it's a theatre movie. Takes a while to get going, but good music, good action, awesome scenery, good humour. Takes me back to the days of the Original Trilogy. And definitely better than that other Prequel Trilogy (which if I had my way, would be permanently erased from both reality and memory. Forever).

No comments:

Post a Comment