The
title should also be appended "And Why I Probably Shouldn't Have" but
whatever. No movie this week, so I'll tell you about why I didn't go to see one
of the biggest movies this year (it's got the second biggest opening weekend
this year, and will probably be in the top five grossing movies in 2012, when
all is said and done).
I
haven't read The Hunger Games (or any of the sequels). I got a page or two into
the first one, but found it to be ... not good. That's unusual for me, because
I usually brag about having a higher tolerance for crap than other people, but
I guess my literary standard is a bit more uppity than I thought. That's not to
say I don't love pulp, but it has to be well-written pulp. Take Star Wars, for
instance. Timothy Zahn knows how to write a book, and can rock the GFFA like
none other, so I really like reading his stuff. But it was only my determined
love of all things Star Wars that propelled me through Kevin J Anderson's
stuff. I imagine that at 15 years of age, the Jedi Academy trilogy would be riveting, but right now, it's rather trite.
So I
passed on The Hunger Games because I didn't like the writing, but also because
I thought the basic plot had been done before. And I say this with all possible
respect, but a tournament to the death is has been used more than the village
bicycle, if you catch my drift. There are actually two plots here, or more
accurately, one wider plot and a narrower one that fits into it.
The
first one is the basic tournement, usually with the losers being killed.
Examples coming to mind are Mortal Kombat (the losers forfeit the souls), Battle Royale (which I haven't
seen), Lionheart (ditto), Bloodsport (again, not seen), and The Condemned
(this time, with prisoners. You can make them do anything if you promise freedom).
The
narrower plot takes the above and sets it slightly in the future, and airs it
on TV. It seems like the one thing movies can agree on is that in the future,
we'll have no taste. Not that we have any now (reality TV comes to mind, as
does Work It, which was thankfully cancelled), but I'd like to think we'd draw
the line at actual death being aired. But then I read an article on Cracked
that reminded me hangings used to be a pretty big show back in the late 1800's
(before we decided they weren't rated E for Everyone), and even farther back,
stoning was decent entertainment. So we definitely have the historical
background to enjoy death, but only if the people deserve it (that's why it's
killing, and not murder). It's not entirely
unjustified that people in the future would watch death on TV. Examples include
The Running Man, Death Race, and Rollerball.
So I
jumped to the conclusion that because The Hunger Games had a similar plot to
many other works of fiction, it must not be good, or that I didn't need to see
it because I've seen it before, so to speak. And that's simply not the case.
Take
Harry Potter. A young man lives with his Aunt and Uncle, discovers he has
magical powers, and grows up to save the world while his best friends fall in
love. Oh yes, and his cool old mentor wizard dies at the hands of one of his
former students. J.K Rowling may as well have called him Harry Skywalker.
Or how
about a young man's parents are killed, so he lives with others. He discovers
he has awesome powers, and so he grows up to save the world while falling in
love. Meet Harry Kent. A young man's parents are killed, so he lives with his
aunt and uncle, has trouble at school, discovers he has awesome powers, grows
up to save the world while falling in love? It's one journalism job away from
Harry Parker.
They
all follow the same basic plot, which is explicitly laid out in The Hero With a Thousand Faces. It's what happened when Joseph Campbell looked at a whole bunch
of different stories and picked out the familiar elements, which got called The Hero's Journey. You can read way more about it in the link. It created a
template (or distilled a template out of thousands of stories) that George
Lucas used when writing Star Wars, which is why so many things can get compared
to it.
All of
which to say that I shouldn't look down on The Hunger Games because it sort of
mixes Mortal Kombat with Death Race (and some 1984 mixed in). I doubt I'll have
the chance to see it in theatre, so I may have to get the DVD. Evan vouched for
it, so there's a good chance that it's actually decent. But don't ask me to
read the books.
At least try the first book. It's not Shakespeare, but it's not terrible either (that's damning with faint praise). The other two books go downhill, so stop after the first one.
ReplyDeleteI have thought about reading the books but i think I will ultimately pass. It's one thing to hear the ridiculous names but I think it would be absolutely maddening to read "Peetah", "Hamish" and "Katniss" over and over. I can hear myself yelling..."JUST GIVE THEM NORMAL NAMES FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!"
ReplyDelete